data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b18d6/b18d6d6df70473aaf8434eb427ba24944e367d18" alt=""
The World Magnetic Model
The following resources detail the history and ongoing development of the World Magnetic Model.
- NGA overview. NGA. The official website for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.
- World Magnetic Model technical overview. NOAA / NCEI. Provides a detailed overview of geomagnetic forces and important considerations for creating the WMM.
- World Magnetic Model video overview. COLABS Colorado. Provides an approachable overview of how the WMM is created and what applications it informs.
- World Magnetic Model summary. British Geological Survey (BGS). Provides an approachable summary of the World Magnetic Model purpose and development process.
- World Magnetic Model applications. NOAA / NCEI. Describes common applications of the World Magnetic Model, including uses for navigation and within consumer electronics.
- 2020 World Magnetic Model Report. NOAA / BGS. Contains a complete report of the World Magnetic Model.
- World Magnetic Model update. Nature International Journal of Science. Describes the erratic motion of the north magnetic pole that necessitated an out-of-cycle update to the WMM.
- World Magnetic Model Mil-Spec. NGA. Details the specifications required for the World Magnetic Model.
- World Magnetic Model data collection procurement notice. A public notice indicating that the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), in accordance with FAR Subpart 5.404 release of long-range acquisition estimates, is planning the procurement of a World Magnetic Model (WMM) global magnetic field data collection capability and is providing public notice to assist industry in its planning to facilitate meeting the acquisition requirements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d35d/3d35d8acd3a5e9e90e5f0e2b187f8b2959db885e" alt=""
Technology
The following resources detail technologies that are used to collect data for the World Magnetic Model or may be potential alternatives. A resource with guidance for on technology readiness definitions is also included.
- Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Guidance. U.S. Department of Defense. Provides descriptions for varying technology readiness levels (TRLs) including TRL 5 and 6, which are both referenced throughout the MagQuest submission form and selection criteria.
- ESA Swarm mission overview. ESA. Provides an overview of the Swarm mission, including primary objectives and technology.
- ESA Swarm mission. BGS. Provides a background on the Swarm missionthat collects data for the WMM today, including an overview of technologyand instrumentation.
- Magnetic field: learning more with Swarm video. ESA. Provides a visual overview of the ESA Swarm mission history and objectives.
- INTERMAGNET ground observatories. Intermagnet. Provides an overview of theglobal ground observatory network structure and objectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5efe/f5efea28b0177e9b230136f86179583525de138a" alt=""
Potential solution areas
The following examples demonstrate a range of solutions that could be submitted. Note that this list is illustrative, and is not a comprehensive list of all potential solution areas
- Spaceborne. A solution that integrates one or more small or large satellites, or proposes adding instrumentation to an unrelated mission as a hosted payload.
- Terrestrial. A solution that indicates how the existing ground observatories or mobile technology could be leveraged.
- Aerial. A solution that proposes drones, balloons, or other aerial technology.
- Data analysis. A solution that proposes how available data sources could be utilized through new advancement in data modeling and processing techniques. (Reminder: the Challenge does not ask solvers for alternate methods of creating the WMM; it asks solvers to identify new data sources to inform the current WMM production.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752f8/752f855b25be726829141b824bd49a57e252ea95" alt=""
Target performance metrics
MagQuest seeks solutions that will capture data sufficient to produce the World Magnetic Model. The performance specifications below represent thresholds for solutions to consider.
These Phase 3 target performance metrics are an updated version of the information provided in previous phases.
Space-based measurement targets
Mission objectives | Determine the structure of the Earth’s magnetic field for navigational, and attitude and heading applications |
---|---|
Measurement objectives | Measure Earth’s main magnetic field strength and direction |
Measurement targets | Measure magnetic field with absolute and vector accuracy of 5 nT or better, noise level of 5 nT (1σ) or lower, 1 sec time resolution |
Instrument targets |
|
Mission targets | For Space: Magnetometer axis orientation knowledge of 10 arc-sec or better; spacecraft magnetically clean and/or magnetometer boom to meet measurement error budget targets; data latency 3 months or less |
Other significant targets
- Spacecraft orbits
- Altitude: within 400-800 km
- Inclination: within 81° – 90° degrees
- Measurements taken at local night (although not exclusively)
- Mission operations
- Full Operational Capability (FOC) by 2027
- Runs through 2047 (20-year program)
- Continuous data collection without gaps of more than 1 month in a 12-month period.
Ground-based measurement targets
Table 1: Performance metrics currently met by INTERMAGNET observatories
1 | Measurement positioning and timing accuracy | Preferably provided by dual frequency GPS receiver |
---|---|---|
2 | Measurement accuracy | 5 nT (In geographic frame, after accounting for orientation error, crustal biases, biases due to temperature effects, mechanical noise, and any other systematic noise source) |
3 | Measurement resolution | 0.1 nT |
4 | Measurement sampling rate | At least one measurement per minute |
5 | Measurement range | -70,000 to 70,000 nT |
6 | Measurement time span | Continuous measurement solutions |
Comments: target #2 is met by observatories meeting INTERMAGNET requirements, provided there is at least a one year overlap with a space-based solution to determine crustal biases. Any potential MagQuest solution that does not contain a space-based component will need to include a solution for crustal bias information, or provide justification it is not necessary.
Table 2: Potential solutions to improve data by INTERMAGNET stations
A | Measurement location | Add N1 observatories to the INTERMAGNET network |
---|---|---|
B | Measurement data latency | Improve data latency at N2 INTERMAGNET network |
Comments: for Potential Solution B, INTERMAGNET could meet the WMM requirements without adding any additional sites if every current ground station provided Quasi-Definitive data in less than one year. Ideally the stations would provide data as quickly as possible. There are currently only a small subset of INTERMAGNET observatories (~59) that meet the one year data latency target.